Aren’t silver ETFs better to buy now because they should “catch up” to gold ETFs? (Trader Q&A)

Enjoy this post? Share the love.

We regularly receive questions from our followers and subscribers with regard to our trading strategy for ETFs and stocks. Upon receiving a question that we think could be very beneficial to other traders, we post it here on our blog, in the Trader Q&A Archives. Below is a question that just came in today, related to this post from a few hours ago, which explained why we bought a gold ETF for a swing trade, rather than a silver ETF.

Trader Question:

Regarding your post this morning…SLV has achieved only 25% of Fibonacci retracement and you see it as much overhead resistance. Wouldn’t you rather deem that to mean “that much more potential for SLV to run up” instead? As a catch-up play compare to gold?

Our Answer:

Hello,

This is a very good question, one I can personally relate to, and am happy to address it.

When I was a new trader back in the last 1990’s, I was primarily a sector trader who focused on trading individual stocks within the sector that was showing the most relative strength. During this time, I consistently made the mistake of buying the sole stock in the group that had not rallied as much as the other stocks in the group (the weakest one). My thinking was that since it is lagging behind the other stocks in the group, is a good play because it must “catch up” to the rest of the stocks in the sector.

However, what I eventually learned was that laggards are laggards for a reason…Institutional traders such as banks, mutual funds, hedge funds are not buying – plain and simple. The actual reason why a particular stock is not being bought as much is another stock within the same industry sector is irrelevant. The point is simply that the stock or ETF is a laggard. I will close by sharing an actual true story the best relates this example…

I remember one day about 13 years ago, when I was a daytrader, I immediately noticed relative strength in the pharmaceutical sector ($DRG) shortly after the market opened. Most of the individual stocks in the industry sector were already up 2 or 3% on the day within the first 30 min. of trading, so my thought was that I would try to find the one stock that had not yet rallied, the one bucking the trend, and I did. It was Schering-Plough (SGP), which was only up 0.1% (basically flat) at the same time the other stocks in the same sector were already up several percent.

Buying SGP at that time, I felt like a genius who would end up making a lot of money by the end of the day because I had spotted the one stock that nobody was buying it. But as you may be able to guess, the outcome of the story was not at all what I had anticipated. By the closing bell, those other stocks that were originally up 2% or 3% on the open, which I was afraid to buy, were now showing large gains of 5% or more on the day. However, my “genius” SGP play was exactly within a few pennies of where I bought it hours earlier. Why? Because it was a laggard within the sector.

In summary, just remember that cheap stocks are cheap stocks for a reason, and the reason they are cheap is irrelevant. The core of our swing trading strategy is to buy HIGH and sell HIGHER, rather than to buy LOW and hope to sell HIGH if the cheap stocks and ETFs catch up.

With time, I eventually figured out a much more profitable strategy was to buy strength. If you would like to learn more about the details of this, particularly the part about why “Cheap Stocks Are Cheap For a Reason,” please see our recently updated Swing Trading Strategy page by clicking here for more details.

Have you ever bought a weak stock within a sector and assumed it would “catch up” to the rest? How did it work out? We’d love to hear you comments below.

 


Enjoy this post? Share the love.
Deron Wagner

Deron Wagner is a professional trader, author of several ETF trading books, and the Founder of Morpheus Trading Group. Since 2002, he has been sharing his proven swing trading strategy with thousands of traders around the world. He has appeared on CNBC, ABC, and Yahoo! Finance Vision television networks, and is a frequent guest speaker at various global investing conferences.

View Comments

  • Great topic, so hard for new investors to buy strength because its natural to think that you have already missed it, and you need to catch the turning point. Good, timeless advice to buy strength

Recent Posts

Unlocking Explosive Gains: Mastering the 20-Day EMA Pullback After a Strong Thrust

Missed the initial breakout? Don't worry - there's still a chance to catch that rocket! Today, we're diving deep into…

2 months ago

Nasdaq Flashes 3 Powerful Buy Signals: Your Ticket to Serious Profits

Discover the three powerful buy signals flashing in the Nasdaq and learn how to profit from the surprising shift in…

3 months ago

Tesla Stock Analysis: 5 Bullish Signals for Swing Trading $TSLA [Sept 2024]

Could Tesla (TSLA) be gearing up for a major bullish run? Veteran analyst Rick Pedicelli breaks down five critical technical…

3 months ago

NASDAQ’s Bloodbath: Navigating the QQQ Plunge and Uncovering Hidden Opportunities

The tech sector has recently experienced a significant downturn, with the NASDAQ index plummeting, but for astute traders, such market…

4 months ago

Decoding Nvidia’s 35% Tumble: A Technical Analysis Masterclass

In the high-stakes world of AI stocks, even giants can stumble. Join us as we dissect Nvidia's recent 35% correction…

4 months ago