The Wagner Daily


Traders kicked off the holiday-shortened week on a positive note, as buyers focused on the semiconductor and other tech-related sectors. The small-cap Russell 2000 Index showed the most relative strength by advancing 0.8%, while the Nasdaq Composite trailed closely behind with a 0.6% gain. The bulls largely ignored the blue chips, causing the Dow Jones Industrial Average to finish unchanged. The S&P 500 gained 0.2% and the S&P Midcap 400 rallied 0.4%. As anticipated, strength in spot gold enabled the StreetTRACKS Gold Trust (GLD) to gain 2.0% and break out above its resistance that we illustrated in yesterday’s newsletter. We bought GLD after it gapped up and traded above its high of the first twenty minutes.

Not surprisingly, volume surged higher across the board. Total volume in the NYSE increased by 20%, while volume in the Nasdaq was 30% higher than the previous day’s level. This, of course, was indicative of traders beginning the return back to their desks after the traditional annual holiday season. The higher turnover enabled the Nasdaq volume to exceed its 50-day average level for the first time since August 17, but the NYSE volume remained below average. Technically, the gains on higher volume enabled both the S&P and Nasdaq to register bullish “accumulation days,” but we were a bit concerned about the minimal gain in the S&P and the unchanged Dow. It appears that a bit of “churning,” the sign of institutional selling into strength, was taking place. Considering a 20% rise in NYSE turnover, the percentage gains in the S&P and Dow should have been greater. Market internals also lacked conviction. In both exchanges, advancing volume exceeded declining volume by only 1.6 to 1. Typically, a healthy day of gains should correspond with a spread of at least 2 to 1, often much greater.

In addition to buying GLD yesterday, we also sold short the S&P Select Utilities SPDR (XLU). On August 31, XLU broke out to a new high from a multi-week base of consolidation. It gapped up the next morning, as one might expect, but the gap failed to hold. XLU finished unchanged that day. In yesterday’s session, XLU exhibited major relative weakness by falling 1.1% while the broad market grinded higher. More importantly, the loss caused it to fully retrace all of the August 31 gain. We sold short XLU because the complete loss of the August 31 gain points to the telltale signs of a failed breakout. As we have mentioned in the past, failed breakouts have a high rate of success for short sellers because the traders who bought the breakout are forced to quickly sell their position, which in turn attracts the bears. Confirmation of the failed breakout will occur when XLU drops below its 20-day moving average, the brown line on the daily chart below:

As the Morpheus ETF Roundup indicates, there are several other ETFs tied to the Utilities sector as well. The Utilities HOLDR (UTH) is one of the most popular ETFs in the sector, but we prefer the more diverse S&P Select Utilities SPDR. When trading XLU, note that it has a very low Average True Range (ATR). This means that it is a low volatility ETF that may require larger than usual share size in order to realize a decent profit from a substantial move.

In determining share size for positions in our hedge fund, we make sure that our maximum capital risk is the same for every position. In order to do so, it is paramount to account for the different volatility in each position. A simple way to do so is by first determining how much room is required for your stop price, then taking that number and dividing it by your maximum capital risk per position. If, for example, you always risk $1,000 per trade and your trade requires a 2 point stop from the initial entry, your maximum share size would be 500 shares ($1,000 / 2 points = 500 shares). For XLU, the obvious stop placement is above the high of September 1. Giving the position enough room that the stop won’t get triggered by a brief probe above the high, we determined that a stop of approximately 70 cents was required from yesterday’s entry near the intraday low. If, however, you sold short UTH instead, a stop of more than 2 points is necessary for a corresponding entry point and stop price. Therefore, in order to keep both the risk and profit potential consistent in both trade setups, a position in XLU should be about three times the share size of a position in UTH. Constantly adjusting your share size to maintain a consistent maximum capital risk is one of the first steps towards developing a winning system in which the math simply works.

Yesterday, one of our subscribers sent an e-mail expressing his concern for our string of losing ETF trade setups over the past several weeks. In case this thought has crossed your mind as well, we wanted to share a few words about this. Though our stock-picking style and strategy has not changed, sometimes the law of averages and standard deviation is simply not our friend. The low volume market of last month did not help either. Regardless, it is important to remember that losing months are a normal part of the business, and traders should always accept the good with the bad. Professional traders neither get excited about winning months, nor feel dejected about losing ones; you should not either. As our historical performance pages indicate, ETF picks from The Wagner Daily have averaged a highly respectable annualized return of over 20% since inception four years ago, but there have been both good and bad months along the way. As always, you can be sure that we remain focused on our proven system of success and consistent, long-term profitability. Thanks to all our loyal subscribers who understand the reality of professional trading.

Today’s Watchlist:

Since we entered two new positions yesterday, there are no new setups in the pre-market today. As always, we will send an intraday e-mail alert if/when we enter anything new.

Daily Performance Report:

Below is an overview of all open positions, as well as a performance report on all positions that were closed only since the previous day’s newsletter. Net P/L figures are based on the $50,000 Wagner Daily model account size. Changes to open positions since the previous report are listed in red text below:

    Open positions (coming into today):

      XLU short (1,000 shares from September 5 entry) –
      sold short 34.47, stop 35.18, target 33.20, unrealized points = + 0.04, unrealized P/L = + $40

      GLD long (300 shares from September 5 entry) –
      bought 63.42, stop 60.72, target 66.55, unrealized points = (0.06), unrealized P/L = ($18)

      IYR short (400 shares from August 23 entry) –
      sold short 74.52, stop 76.54, target 69.80, unrealized points = (1.79), unrealized P/L = ($716)

    Closed positions (since last report):

      MZZ long (250 shares from August 23 entry) –
      bought 73.03 (avg.), sold 70.17, points = (2.86), net P/L = ($720)

    Current equity exposure ($100,000 max. buying power):



      Per intraday e-mail alert, we sold short XLU for a new trade entry. Details of the trade are listed above. The GLD setup we listed in the pre-market also triggered, but MZZ was stopped out. Going into today, you will see that we adjusted the IYR stop by a very small amount to give it a little bit of “wiggle room” above yesterday’s high. Notice, however, that we remain below our maximum predetermined loss limit of $1,000 per trade, even with the minor modification to the stop.

    for glossary and explanation of terms used in The Wagner Daily

    Click here to view MTG’s past performance results (updated monthly).

    Edited by Deron Wagner,
    MTG Founder and
    Head Trader