As expected, the abominable earnings reports from Intel and Yahoo! after Tuesday’s close triggered a wave of tech-related selling in the Nasdaq yesterday. Although it recovered from an opening intraday loss of 1.7%, the Nasdaq Composite still finished 1.0% lower. The weakness spread to the S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrials as well, but each index lost only 0.4%. The small-cap Russell 2000 demonstrated impressive relative strength and closed unchanged, while the mid-cap S&P 400 fell only 0.2%. Yesterday’s price divergence within the major indices tells us it was primarily the large-cap tech stocks that bore the brunt of the heavy selling.
For the second consecutive day, both the S&P and Nasdaq registered a bearish “distribution day” that was indicative of institutional selling. Total volume in the Nasdaq surged 31% higher, but volume in the NYSE crept only 3% above the previous day’s level. It was the fourth day of higher volume losses (aka “distribution”) within the past four weeks and the second this month. Given that the Nasdaq kicked off the 2006 by rallying nearly 6% on seven straight days of gains, a subsequent day or two of institutional selling should not be surprising. But now that the major indices have corrected down to key support levels, pay close attention to the price and volume patterns over the next several days. A healthy market should see only lighter volume down days over the next week, as well as at least a day or two of higher volume gains (“accumulation”). Remember that volume is the footprint of institutional activity, so a daily analysis of price and volume levels of the broad market enables us to see what is really happening “under the hood” of the markets.
Did you notice how both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite perfectly found support at the support levels we illustrated in yesterday morning’s Wagner Daily? The former highs of last December enabled the major indices to regain their footing because prior resistance levels always become the new support levels after the resistance is broken. The convergence of the 20-day moving averages near the December highs also helped to prevent further losses and perfectly marked the low of the day in both the S&P and Nasdaq:
The charts above are a great example of how the most effective methods of technical analysis are typically the most simple ones as well. Finding horizontal price support from prior highs and resistance from prior lows on daily charts is an extremely reliable, yet basic, method of technical analysis for swing trading. Comparing price action with volume spikes on daily charts is also a fundamental, yet often overlooked, method of technical analysis. Uptrending stocks, indices, and ETFs should see higher volume on many of the “up” days, but lighter volume on the “down” days. For shorting downtrends, we want to see higher volume on the “down” days and ligher volume on the “up” days.
Although the S&P and Nasdaq both found support where they were “supposed to” yesterday, the big question is whether or not those support levels will hold over the next several days. Ideally, we would like to see closing prices near their intraday highs in today’s session, which would position the broad market for a rally attempt tomorrow. Obviously, higher volume on an “up” day would be bullish as well. As for potential new long entries off of support, we recommend waiting for confirmed breakouts above the downtrends on the 60-minute charts. To illustrate, we have drawn the downtrend line on the hourly chart of SPY (S&P 500) below:
Remember that the longer the time frame, the more significant the trend. Therefore, an uptrend on a daily chart holds more weight than a downtrend on a 60-minute chart. In this case, the primary uptrend on the daily chart of SPY is still intact, which is the only reason we would consider buying a breakout of the 60-minute downtrend. If doing so, your stop should be just below the absolute low of the 60-minute downtrend. There are numerous other ETFs with similar chart patterns to SPY, but this example was just for educational purposes. Other broad-based ETFs such as QQQQ, DIA, IWM, and MDY, as well as a handful of sector ETFs, are all worthy of consideration on a breakout above their 60-minute downtrend lines. Of course, all bets are off on the long side if yesterday’s lows are broken, especially if volume increases as well.
Apple Computer and eBay were the latest tech giants to report their quarterly earnings. Both were trading lower in after-hours trading yesterday, but the S&P and Nasdaq futures are currently poised for a higher open today. Earnings season is just beginning to kick into gear, so remain cognizant of important earnings dates over the next few weeks.
PGJ – PowerShares China Fund
Trigger = above 15.18 (above the Jan. 18 high)
Target = new high (will trail stop)
Stop = 14.65 (below low of consolidation)
Shares = 1,000
Notes = This setup did not trigger yesterday, but we still like it for potential long entry today. Chinese stocks have been showing incredible relative strength in the new year, as evidenced by the chart patterns of FXI, CHN, and PGJ. We have been waiting for a small correction in the Chinese sector, and a nice correction by time has taken place in PGJ over the past seven sessions. Due to the volatility resulting from key earnings reports in the U.S. markets this week, we are looking for ETF trades that are less likely to be directly affected by the U.S. markets, and PGJ fits the bill.
Although PGJ only trades an average daily volume of less than 100,000 shares per day, remember that ETFs are synthetic instruments that are pegged to the underlying prices of the stocks that comprise its portfolio. As such, the bid/ask prices of an ETF will always rise and fall as the prices of the underlying stocks change. Therefore, liquidity is not a concern with PGJ or any other low-volume ETF. The only factor to be concerned with is a potentially large bid/ask spread, but we have noticed that PGJ generally trades with a spread of only 3 to 4 cents. Using limit orders will provide you with security in this regard as well.
Daily Performance Report:
Below is an overview of all open positions, as well as a performance report on all positions that were closed only since the previous day’s newsletter. Net P/L figures are based on the $50,000 Wagner Daily model account size. Changes to open positions since the previous report are listed in red text below:
Open positions (coming into today):
PPH long (500 shares from Jan. 3 entry) –
bought 70.35, stop 70.80, target: half at 73.45, half at 75.20, unrealized points = + 1.19, unrealized P/L = + $595
Closed positions (since last report):
DIA long (300 shares from Jan. 9 entry) –
bought 109.89, sold 108.22, points = (1.67), net P/L = ($507)
Current equity exposure ($100,000 max. buying power):
Due to an opening gap down below our stop, we used the MTG Opening Gap Rules and adjusted the DIA stop to 10 cents below the low of the first 20 minutes. It stopped out (by only a penny) later in the afternoon. We will send an intraday e-mail alert if we re-enter DIA, or anything else, on a break above the hourly downtrend lines. PGJ did not trigger yesterday, but we still like it for potential entry today.
here for glossary and explanation of terms used in The Wagner Daily
Click here to view MTG’s past performance results (updated monthly).
Edited by Deron Wagner,
MTG Founder and